Another potential benefit is tax and estate planning. In the event of the death of a spouse, the condominium may benefit from special “enhanced base” treatment. The parties can convert a certain piece of separate property into common property and then enter a common property with survival right. If you are considering a property conversion agreement, seek advice from a competent advisor to get a full understanding of the impact of such an agreement. Here`s how real estate transmutation usually occurs. A party owns a house before the marriage and, after the marriage, gives the two spouses the title of “husband and wife” in common rent. This is how they gave the value of the house to marriage and it becomes a common good. Separate boxes can also be converted into condominiums by refinancing a loan during the wedding. And if the parties cannot accept another outcome when negotiating their divorce, that estate must be split. A marital/post-marital agreement is a spouse-to-spouse contract before or during the marriage, which determines the distribution of their property, debts, income and expenses. While many of these agreements are related to the way property is treated in the event of the death of a spouse or divorce, they may also cover a number of other issues, such as. B the classification of property during marriage.
Agreements to transform the separate property of a condominium spouse are becoming more and more popular. Such an agreement can be an affectionate gesture of one spouse to take care of the other. These agreements can also be a means of influencing inheritance. These conversion agreements can have favourable tax effects. In some situations, such an arrangement can be a way for a false husband to compensate for something he has done wrong in marriage. One of the reasons for the transformation of the property is to create a community real estate interest in the property that is transformed, to the benefit of the other spouse. Here, at least one spouse benefits because he is now interested in real estate that he may not otherwise have. The same rule applies to common ownership – the court cannot order an essentially unequal distribution of common property to repay the spouse who misappropriated disassociated funds to acquire the asset.